Kingdom of Golf

If you love to read about golf, you're home. Play the game with honor & enjoy the Kingdom of Golf.

October 19, 2012

It's hard to let go of the magic.


You never know until it's there. You know, a special day of golf.

Met a golf bud of mine at one of my least favorite courses for some late afternoon golf yesterday. He was late (as usual) and we didn't tee off until 4:15.

Smashed a nice 3 wood off the first tee down the left center. Should have been perfect. Instead, I nearly didn't find it. Turns out it was in some old, muddy tire tracks.

Bogey...bogey...bogey...double. 

Each bogey a missed par put that coulda (but didn't) fall.

Sigh.

Then, a hard working par.

Then, a really good drive on a tight par 5 and a 3 wood onto the front of the green with a front pin.

Tap in birdie.

Followed by a bogey.

But then, easy par, easy par shoulda been a birdie on a long par 3 over water.

The sun fell behind the San Rafael Hills before we finished the 9th.

But, we carried on until it was too dark to see and almost too dark to drive the cart back. The darker it got, the better I hit it. My last shot was a hybrid to a back pin of long par three.

Yellow ball...saw it sail over the flag.

No, didin't make it, but tapped in for par.

We finished 14 holes, putted out on all of 'em. It was one of the only times I have ever been glad I was in a cart. It would have been impossible to cover the ground on foot in the time we had.

It's a long golf course...

Anyway, the whole thing, going from the late start, to being unlucky and annoyed on the first, to going from bad to good (and even better than good) then toward the dark, had that odd and wonderful kind of buzz only golf can deliver.

I'm playing again in a couple hours, but I almost don't want to go.

It's hard to let go of the magic.

October 9, 2012

PURE Grip: Truly a Better Golf Grip

Most people know golf equipment as gotten better over the years.

Or has it?

There was a time when pretty much all grip companies made their products from natural rubber, right here in the US. That day is gone. Today's grips are made of thermoplastics, polymers and silicone and most are made anywhere but here. 

I'm not the only one to question if this is a good trend.

PURE Grip makes their grips in Arizona and they make them out of 100% natural rubber. Making their product in the US gives them quality control, using actual rubber gives golfers control and the great feel only 100% rubber can provide.


One claim I was a little suspicious of was PURE's contention that their grips will last longer than the competition. I wasn't sure why that would be true and, worse, I wasn't sure how I could test the claim. Stay tuned and I'll tell you about my test later.

Let's cut to the chase: PURE Grips feel fantastic. The grip surface is uniformly tacky and cleans up perfectly after play. I must say they feel a lot like the premium rubber grips of years ago that I'm more than old enough to remember. I installed sample grips on my driver, hybrid, 7 iron and sand wedge so I could get a feel for how they worked with a variety of swings. The grips PURE supplied varied in style and surface type, but each has a distinctive and secure PURE feel that will be hard to give up once you've tried it.

Back to my durability test. When I did was to take two wedges, both freshly gripped, one with a PURE grip and the other with a very well-known brand of grip (you know which brand). Then, each wedge was left in the trunk of my car for months, in Los Angeles, in one of the hottest summers in recent memory. Every now and then, I'd take both wedges with me to the driving range. After a short time, the competing grip started to feel hard and plasticky; almost like it was breaking down and old mold release material was leaching out. The PURE grip stayed fresh and tacky feeling over the long hot summer. Even someone who doesn't play could feel the difference right away.

By using PURE Grips, I can finally say that all golf equipment is better than it used to be. It took a long time to find a grip that is genuinely better than the rest, but PURE Grips were worth the wait.

October 2, 2012

Ryder Cup 2012: The Three Mistakes of Davis Love III

Images by Action Images - www.actionimages.com

In case you wonder who the three mistakes are, I'll be happy to give you their names:

Jim Furyk, Brandt Snedeker & Steve Stricker.

Hopefully, Davis Love III is the last Ryder Cup Captain to believe the Grizzled Verteran Theory of Captain's Picks. Here's hoping he's also the last captain to favor players from his own generation when he makes those picks.

I think the Ryder Cup selection process is ready for a change: Either comprise the team of the Top 12 or give the captain the power to pick every member of his team.

Even though DLIII's picks were lousy, what really got the US team was being too hot early and just not hot enough down the stretch. It's that simple and it's the flip-side of what happened to Europe in 1999, In golf, there's simply no way to keep a fire burning that brightly all three days.

I cannot figure out why there's always something awkward about the US team. Mickelson's obviously well-intended kudos to Rose just felt rather weird; calculated, contrived...just odd. Jim Furyk is usually a little prickly after a loss but his, "Ask Sergio and he'll tell you I outplayed him." comment was even less gracious than usual.

The Americans seem destine to go over the top when they win and become sullen and humorless when they lose.

The Euros? Well, somehow they're always just the Euros.

September 19, 2012

Wilson Staff Zip Golf Ball Review


Look, I'm trying to play more golf. That's been my plan this summer and will continue into the fall. I'm fine with greens fees, cost of being an occasional club flipper and all the rest.

But, of late, I've gotten a tad pissy about the cost of golf balls.

No, I'm not talking about the $45 a dozen for Pro V1s. I'm talking about the high 20s I pay for my Nike One Vapor Blacks. It's not the biggest expense ever, but commensurate with my goal of saving some cash while playing more I decided to check out some cheesey balls and see how low I could go money-wise without losing something I enjoy.

Enter the Wilson Zip. It's kind of a dreary looking ball with its flat dimples. Even the Staff logo looks a little off somehow. not overly rich or clear...rather like a mediocre inkjet image compared to a really sharp laser. My in-store fingernail-tap test was inconclusive but I figured for $14.99 a dozen, they deserved a try.


One Zip got me through 18 holes and I was very pleased with the ball overall.

Off the driver I had no issues; it seemed as long as the One Vapor Black with similar spin. Full iron swings generated good spin with a slightly higher flight than I expected. Feel on short shots was fine but spin was reduced relative to the One Vapor Black, and that's when even a touch of spin means the difference from keeping the ball on the green or having it release.

Feel and sound off the putter was exceptional. It's hard to imagine many players being disappointed if the compare the Zip to their favorite premium ball on the green.

The modest look of the Zip's cover made me wonder about the ball's durability. In 18 holes, I caught a couple iron shots thin and hit a number of hard wedge shots but there was no cover loss I could see in the grooves or on the ball. I would that the Nike One Vapor Black showed wear slightly more quickly than the Zip.

Wilson is definitely doing their homework on their golf balls, either that or someone's doing it for them.

Either way, I found the Zip to be a good, consistent ball and a truly amazing one for the money.

Labels:

September 12, 2012

Andrew & Benji take on The Dakotas Tour


In 1996 Tiger Woods said, “Hello world,” and things haven’t been the same since. Before Woods ever put a tee into the ground as a professional he’d been made a multimillionaire by Nike and Titleist. For the first time, far more of a player’s income was going to come from sponsorships than tournament winnings. A new world order had arrived and golf almost instantly expanded into a truly global game.

Since then, we’ve said hello to a bunch of mini-Tigers like Rory McIlroy, Rickie Fowler and Ryo Ishikawa. What each of these players have in common (along with a lot of game) is a massive corporate support mechanism. Each is as much a brand as a player. Fowler actively cultivates his image and look on his website by asking, “Love my look?” His Cowboy-orange and flat-billed cap are tools helping to set himself apart from the rest of the khaki-clad PGA Tour crowd. And, while it would be easy (if a tad cynical) to say most great players have set themselves apart by winning, Fowler has made himself a very recognizable brand especially for a player who has only recently won his first PGA Tour event.

I don’t want to create the impression I don’t like this crop of young, corporately well-connected, players because for the most part I do. It’s just that I also enjoy following the kind of player who lacks such deep-pocketed support. It’s important to understand how many players come to professional golf in anonymity and with significant hardship.

It’s well known Ben Hogan failed on the PGA tour at least once before finally breaking through. Before succeeding, he was down to his last bit of cash, $86 from a war chest of $1400. He had promised his wife Valerie (who was driving with him from event to event) that if he didn’t earn a check in the next tournament they would take what little money they had left and make their way home to Fort Worth, Texas. The morning before the tournament, the Hogans awoke to find their Buick stripped of its rear tires and wheels, its rear axle propped up on rocks.

Hogan got a ride to the tournament and ended up winning $385. Hogan described that check as the biggest one he had ever seen and he was quite sure it was the biggest he would ever see in his entire life. It’s impossible to imagine that Hogan sponsored by Nike, given millions of dollars before he had ever put a tee into the ground in a professional event. Hogan is a reminder that for every Tiger Woods and Rickie Fowler there are thousands of aspiring players who come up another way; a much harder way.

Jim Von Lossow came to professional golf in a way much closer to that of Hogan than of Fowler or Woods. Jim’s an old friend of mine and some years back he told me of his time on the PGA Tour. He was only 20 when he left Seattle for California and his parents had no love for the idea of playing professional golf. Jim’s quest to play on tour was one he faced largely on his own. He ended up on tour for a few years and even played alongside some storied players like Tom Kite and Jack Fleck. Though Jim didn’t make many headlines while on tour, his journey led him to become a PGA instructor, the first putter manufacturer to mill heads from 303 stainless steel and now one of the most respected club fitters in the country.

It’s no surprise that Jim and his wife, Susan, have two children who grew up excelling at golf; their daughter, Hannah, and son, Andrew. When it came to Andrew, Jim hadn’t realized how good he’d gotten until Andrew and his friend, Eric Benjamin, shot back to back rounds in the low 60s. This got Jim thinking and he and Susan decided to stake Andrew and Benji enough cash to cover a summer playing The Dakotas Tour. “When I was coming up, I didn’t have the support of my parents when it came to golf,” Jim told me. “So, it was important to me that my wife and I give Andrew and Benji whatever help we could.”

Toward the end of July, Andrew and Benji loaded Andrew’s 1997 Toyota Camry and headed east toward Bozeman, Montana. Bozeman would serve as the duo’s home base for their summer on The Dakotas Tour since Benji knew some folks there. Andrew & Benji missed the first eight events of the 2010 Dakotas Tour season. These tournaments were played in cities with names like Okoboji, Iowa. Obscurity is common in professional golf. A serious golf fan might be able to name 50 PGA Tour players but there are 125 exempt spots. Add the players on the Nationwide Tour, the Canadian Tour and all the myriad other mini tours and we’re talking about serious obscurity. Galleries consist of friends and family, but more likely no one at all. Testing one’s game on a tour like the Dakotas was a strong reminder that golf can be a very solitary game, especially for aspiring professionals like Andrew & Benji.

Still, this is a duo that’s pretty comfortable with obscurity. They’ve even created their own organization to promote it; The Northwest Obscure Golf Association. Andrew & Benji came up with the name when they were forced to admit that to play as much as they needed to play to sharpen their games they’d have to play on some of the area’s scruffier courses. So, for two months of summer in 2010, Andrew & Benji tested their games against other aspiring professionals. They played some golf, they drove a lot of miles and had a lot of fun. At the end of the summer, they both agreed it had been the best one ever.

After arriving in Bozeman, Andrew & Benji drove about 700 miles for a one day Pro-Am at Wild Oak GC in Mitchell, South Dakota. For the next few weeks, Andrew & Benji teed it up twice in Yankton, South Dakota at Fox run and then at the open qualifier at Hillcrest Country Club.

Which open? The Bobcat State Open at Fargo Country Club, of course. Notably, the state animal of South Dakota is the coyote, so go figure. Jim Von Lossow had told me what good players his son Andrew and daughter had become, but it was Andrew’s humble blogging that drove home just what fine players he and Benji are and at the same time what a difficult undertaking they were attempting.

Andrew’s first blog entry:

Benji and I played a practice round at Fargo Country Club. It was a nice day, around 80 degrees with a slight breeze. The forecast for tomorrow is calling for wind and sun. I tee off at 8:20am while Benji tees off at 1:20pm. 

The greens are very firm and fast. The key to approach shots is staying below the hole and taking one club less for the ball to run up to the pin. This is a very Northwest style golf course so Benji and I feel comfortable playing here.

Here are a few pics from today at Fargo Country Club...



To the casual reader, I’m sure these photos look like two really good players teeing off. But, when I look at them I’m trying to imagine if Andrew & Benji felt differently when they put the tee in the ground. They were doing what they had done thousands of times before, but they were doing it for a very different reason. Their ability, their pure joy in playing the game and their newfound drive to play golf for a living had taken Andrew & Benji to this very unusual place.

I once watched Nick Price in one of his first tournaments on the Champion’s Tour. I had sought him out before he teed off to tell him how much I enjoyed his book, The Swing, which had come out a few years earlier. Nick Price was as kind and gracious a man as his reputation would suggest. There were a few people who watched him tee off, but by the 3rd hole his gallery had all but vanished. It was a perfect, glorious day in Southern California and one of the best players in the game was playing a competitive round of golf in almost total solitude.

That was an odd event. It was the first day of a tournament that had been moved from one course to another and attendance would be light until the weekend. But, that day reminded me what a lonely and isolating game professional golf can be. As I walked with Price I marveled at his rapid-fire swing and the dead-solid sound the ball made when he struck it with an iron, and I felt a little sorry for him.

I know...Price wasn’t really alone, let alone lonely. Still, live professional golf very often doesn’t always bear as much similarity to the game we see on television as we might expect.

Andrew & Benji were taking their first steps toward becoming a colleague of Nick Price. I’m sure they didn’t see it that way. They were and are good friends who wanted most of all to have their best summer ever. While they were at it, they would measure their games against each other and against the games of the other players with the same mission.

They both knew it wouldn’t be easy:

Day 31-33

Day 1 of the Bobcat North Dakota State Open:

Benji and I both shot 75. I played in the morning and made the turn at 3 over and shot even on the back. 

For Benji's round in the afternoon the wind picked up and baked out the greens. He hit a flagstick from 190 yards and the ball then went into the water in the greenside hazard. In the last 3 tournaments, Benji has at least hit one flag per tourney. His round also lasted 6.5 hours. 

Day 2:

Benji shot 70. He played solid but just had one bad hole. He was punching out from the trees when his ball caught the trunk of a tree sending it into the hazard. Benji missed the cut by 2.

For myself, I shot 81. Made the turn at 3 over again and knew I had to make some moves if I wanted any chance of making the cut. Instead the round went the other way.

We are leaving North Dakota today and heading to Milbank, South Dakota. We will drive 3 hours and play a practice round at Pine Hills Golf Club for a one day Pro Am tomorrow, August 30th.

We are looking forward to playing a new course and teeing it up in another tournament.

For 7,000 miles, Andrew & Benji chased the little white ball across the Dakotas and into Montana, going all the way east to Iowa for the Tour Championship. They were like the golf equivalents of Jack Kerouac and Neal Cassady, hopping from town to town, staying at KOA campgrounds. Playing golf was the reason for their trip but I will bet it was the trip itself they’ll remember most keenly. As another Cervantes once wrote, “The Journey is better than the inn.” In an era when people are brought together over vast distance by technology, it’s even more important to venture into the expanse from time to time. I’m sure Andrew & Benji would agree.



I wondered a lot about Andrew & Benji and their dream of playing golf for a living. In fact, when I started working on this story, I wasn’t even sure they really wanted to play the game for a living. So, I talked to Andrew about it.

Today, Andrew Von Lossow’s day job is studying Design at Eastern Washington University where he’s on schedule to graduate in 2013. He told me about the reaction of his fellow students when he tells that in his spare time he’s a professional golfer. Not surprisingly, they don’t quite know what that means. When most people think of the word professional, they think of doctors and lawyers, not golfers. 

When asked to describe his game, Andrew said, “My strength is ball striking. I can hit high long irons and from there I have good confidence in my other irons. My chipping and pitching are works in progress. Same with my putting; I am a streaky putter I can really get it going when I am on. When I'm not, it is a lot of two putts and the occasional and dreaded 3 putt.” He’s clearly a guy who believes in his game and has done a lot to develop it from working with a number of teaching pros to enhancing his overall fitness by following a rigorous fitness regimen developed by the Titleist Performance Institute. 

As ever, golf is a game of making three shots into two shots any way you can. The different mind set of the truly fine player is revealed when he says, “Once I make one birdie, I feel I can string them together. The more birdies I make, the more unaware of my score I get because I get caught up on the next shot to make the lowest score possible.” Poor players don’t think that way. A couple good holes is more likely to make them protective than confident. Andrew clearly has the confidence to go low when the opportunity comes his way, as he did by finishing 5th and winning $800 in the Gallatin Valley Open. 

He wrote about the event and the end of his first pro tour:

Back Home

What a journey it was out in the Dakotas. Benji and I both agree that this was the best summer we have ever had. Benji had some great finishes in tournaments while I was enrolled in the school of hard knocks in the tour life. What I learned was very important for becoming a better player. Golf is not easy as we all know. 

The last tournament, The Gallatin Valley Open, I came in 5th shooting 72-68. The first day I shot 4-over 40 on the front nine and I took some experience from my previous tournaments and shot 4-under 32 on the back nine. The next day I shot a bogey free 68 to make a move up the leader board to cash my first professional check.

I’ll bet Andrew’s closing 68 felt so easy. At the same time, I’m sure that front nine 40 must have had him doubting that he was cut out to play professional golf. The ability to turn off those doubts and salvage par says a lot about his resiliency. Still, it must be extraordinarily difficult for an aspiring professional to measure his game, until the heat of professional competition gets turned up. Then it becomes easy, if potentially confidence crushing. There are so many good players today. As sure as I am that the best players of eras gone by like Nicklaus, Hogan and Ballesteros would still be amazingly successful players today, I’m equally certain the depth of quality players is greater today than it’s ever been.

No one needs to tell Jim Von Lossow about the difficult challenge that lay ahead for his son. There is surely no way to tell whether Andrew will be able to make a living playing golf. But, that’s not really the point. In golf and in life, outcomes are never assured. All we can do is make our best swing, go find the ball, and do it all again.

Today, Andrew & Benji are continuing to hone their games in preparation for their next trek on tour. They’re sure to have plenty of birdies and their fair share of bogies when they do. 

Their best summers ever are just ahead.










August 22, 2012

Augusta National Invites Two Women: So?

The huddled masses of wealth and power that are the membership of Augusta National have decided to invite two women into their ranks. The first is an obvious choice, legendary golfer and all around politico, Condeleeza Rice.

Condi Rice: Augusta's Newest Big Hitter
(Mark Ralston - AFP/Getty Images)
I can just imagine Billy Payne saying, "Man, can that little lady ever bomb it! We gotta get her and I mean get her now!"

The second is Darla Moore and I don't even know or care to know who she is...

Augusta is the kind of organization with no interest in doing the right thing, unless the right thing fits with their agenda. If they had what it took to stand up and tell the world they are an exclusively male club, irrespective of the fact that the profits of publicly traded corporations pay the lion's share of the dues, I could respect them. If they showed evidence of a growing sensitivity to the kind of club they aspired to be, I could respect them.

But, the fact is they did it to buoy their public image and I can't respect that at all.

They could have invited native Georgian and one of the founders of the LPGA tour, Louise Suggs. Or, they could have invited Hall of Fame member Judy Rankin. They could have invited a woman golfer in the same way they invited male golfers back when a win at The Masters also meant a membership to the club.

Instead, Augusta served its own interests and no one else's.



August 14, 2012

SeeMore FGP Review: The Best Putter in the World is in My Bag!

I want you to know that when the late Payne Stewart won the US Open in 1999, I had no interest in trying a SeeMore putter.

I also want you to know that when Zach Johnson won The Masters in 2007 I, again, had no interest in trying a SeeMore putter.

You see, I was already a pretty fair putter and believed my collection of Ping Anser-style Scotty Camerons were just fine & peachy.

They weren't and it took an impulse-buy from used club bargain barrel to prove it to me.

One day while browsing the used clubs at my local golf club pusher I came across a really nice SeeMore FGP. It was all original, down to the grip and the 34" sticker. I could see it had been used but not abused. I looked down at the price...$29.

Did I roll a few with it in the store? No, I just plopped down my cash and took that baby on home.

Of course, I had done this very same thing scores of times before. I would probably end up rolling a few putts across the living room and then consign the poor, old putter to a spot in the back of the closet until I found time to Ebay it.

But, that's not what happened.

I did roll a few putts with it in the house. It was odd: Even though I had never used a SeeMore before I found it comfortingly  familiar. It sat squarely and aimed easily. Best of all, the ball rolled tightly and right on the line I chose. I rolled ball after ball, clicking one ball directly into the back of another until four or five of them looked like a little train made of golf balls.

Hmmm...

Over the next couple days I took the old FGP out to my local course and rolled putts with it. Pretty much everything either gave the cup a good fright or tumbled in. I had no idea what was happening, but I knew the SeeMore was going directly into my bag.

From that time onward, the SeeMore FGP has been in my bag and won't be leaving. Sure, I still hit lousy putts but when my head is right, I make a lot of putts and it is all the result of using the FGP.

I never paid much attention to the weighting of the FGP. I mean, who cares when you're making putts? But, one day I had the putter laying on my kitchen table and noticed that the toe was pointing straight down. The FGP has 100% toe hang...I have never seen that before.

It turns out that SeeMore calls this weighting face balanced at impact. I had no idea what that means, so I was happy when SeeMore's Jim Grundberg offered to explain:

"The original design was called FGP for Featuring Ground Plumb, and our modern interpretation of that is simply face balanced at impact.  Because, while the putter toe does indeed face down when balanced on a table or your finger, we realized that is not really important. And that is because we don't putt with the putter at 90 degrees, but rather closer to 70 degrees.  And the FGP putter, no matter the size or type of the arc that a player employs (all the way from square to square to a full arc), will square itself up in the impact zone."

Mr. Grundberg went on to say, "If a player builds a balanced stance and posture and allows the putter to simply swing itself in essence, the putter will rotate slightly to the inside on the take away, and slightly to the inside on release, yet be perfectly square at impact. That is its natural state at impact. Square!  And not coincidentally, during this same perfect stroke, if a player were to watch the putter head back and through (we suggest they do this in practice occasionally, just to prove a point), the signature SeeMore red dot would be hidden at all times, and the two white lines would be visible. Very quickly this all becomes rather second nature, and happens without thought, so the golfer simply makes putts and loves the results. So, it is a very real technology which helps the golfer in a very non-confusing, non-invasive, way that just makes the game more fun!"

Me? I'm all for non-confusing and non-invasive fun. Anyway, it's long been a practice of mine to keep a putter in my trunk in case I have time to roll a few while waiting for an appointment or after work. But, for some reason I genuinely hated the idea of leaving the FGP in the trunk I mean, anything could happen; the car could get stolen or broken into or who knows?  Is that paranoia or caution? Either way, I resolved to order a new FGP as a back up.

It turns out SeeMore is a great company to do business with and I was pleased to be able to build my putter just the way I wanted it. Three days after placing the order a nice, new SeeMore box had been carefully placed on my front porch by my friendly FedEx driver.

Let's take a look at the two putters and see how they're alike and how they differ:


The original brass FGP on the left 
and the stainless FGP on the right.
The original FGP was painted brass and the new FGP is painted (powder coated?) stainless steel. Both are (I believe) cast and later the face is milled. This is a very sensible way to make a putter and would surely make Karsten Solheim proud of the folks at SeeMore.

I've grown fond of the rather lively sound of the brass head, so the more muted sound of the steel head has taken a little getting used to. There's plenty of research showing that there's no difference in the actual feel of putter heads of identical dimension but made of differently prepared metals (cast, forged or milled).  What we think we feel is actually a reflected in what we hear. So then, the brass head feels (sounds?) a touch more lively than the steel. Both SeeMores feel dead-solid when hit anywhere near the sweet spot.

The only physical difference between the two heads I could find can be seen in the two photos below.


The original FGP has a fuller center section...


...while the new FGP is slightly narrower in this area.

Another interesting difference between old and new SeeMores is the slightly softer first step on the new putter. I actually noticed that the shaft was softer when I was tapping down a ball mark, then when I got home I looked and noticed the difference side by side.

The new putter also has a very cool, blue, patent-leather headcover that is distinctly more attention grabbing than the somber and basic black of the original. I like 'em both!


Black and Blue: SeeMore Putter Covers

Sadly, the grip on my original FGP had gotten very slick. I tried to revive it with every technique I knew, but it was no use. It was done. So, I replaced it with a 65 gram SuperStroke which has proven ot be a good grip (I like the fact that it doesn't taper) but am not crazy about the grip's somewhat card-boardy feel. I kinda dropped the dropped the ball and ordered my new SeeMore with the wrong grip (I got a standard sized Golf Pride when I meant to get the slightly larger version).

The soles of the FGPs are also subtly different.


Old FGP on top and the new on the bottom.

Now that I've covered the look of the SeeMore FGPs, let me tell you why I believe they're the very best putters you can buy (in a sea of pretty good ones). It's quite simple: The SeeMore FGP makes it easy to hit putts on the intended line. After just a few strokes, anyone who is paying attention will notice it. The unique weighting of the head combines with SeeMore's alignment-aiding and patented RifleScope technology to create the most consistently on-path roll I have ever experienced.

No, the SeeMore FGP won't read putts for you. But, the amazing thing is that when you're confident in your line it's easier to see and, equally importantly, to trust your line. As the line becomes reliable, a natural awareness of the best speed starts to take hold. With the FGP I have made, and come very close to making, a large bucket full of long putts. The FGP seems to accentuate a player's strengths while minimizing his weaknesses.

Is there a player out there who won't putt better with an FGP? Plenty. Why is this true? Because lots of players simply succumb to poor putting. I know; I did it to myself for years. After a while, it gets oddly easy to accept missing putts. A player who wants to putt better has to get his mind right first. He must convince himself that he can putt, that putting can be practiced, and that well-struck putts will fall.

For me, using a SeeMore FGP has made that happen more than any other putter I have ever used.



Should the Long Putter be banned?

I've been cogitating on the subject of long putters for a while now. I'll never use one because I find them inelegant and cumbersome. Since they don't look right to me I can be confident I would never putt well with one.

But, some people do...

I don't have much pity for the in-their-prime tour players, or the up and coming pros and elite amateurs, who are using long putters with great success. They could and should be putting with a conventional putter but they see the long putter as an advantage, whether it is or not.

More interesting is the player who, without the long putter, would be done and gone. Here I'm thinking of the ageless Bernhard Langer. Langer has been using the long putter since 1997 and he was pretty much forced into using it. Being almost 40, he was just at the point where the natural decline of skill would have joined with the yips to make him an instant non-contender. Instead, at 53 he is still playing great, though even with the long putter he never quite stops complaining about his play on the greens.

There are two theories of why the long putter should be banned. The first is that it is anchored at the butt end of the club to the player. The second is that in most cases players who use long putters adopt a grip which separates their two hands.

I find both theories compelling.

The use of any anchor point strikes me as against the spirit of the rules. The rules speak of playing the game using a stroke, and from stroke we speak of a swing, but can a club really be said to swing when it is in contact with three points of body (both hands and the torso)? I am pretty sure even the most staunch proponent of the long putter would balk at a player wearing a concave pad on their torso that the butt of the club fit into. It would be easy to conclude the player was using that pad to make the butt of the club even more well anchored than would otherwise be true. But, the fact is that the mere contact of the club with anything other than the hands should convey this suspicion of illegality.

The theory that the golf swing is one wherein the player creates a grip using both hands together also strikes me as reasonable. I first read this view in one of Harvey Pennick's books. Quite simply, golf is not croquet or polo, or even or baseball (google a picture of Honus Wager if you miss my reference.)